Puoi inviare un commento, o fare un trackback dal tuo sito.

114 Commenti a “Merry Xmas Mr. Bush”

Pagine: « 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 »

100

swampthing scrive:
31 Gennaio 2006 ore 13:34

>almeno noi non facciamo differenza fra caduti americani

non la faccio. il filmato era destinato ad un pubblico americano… visto che la morte degli iracheni sembra fare poca presa sulle coscienze (non lo vedo alla tv, quindi non è importante) almeno quella dei soldati americani si.

99

ozzy scrive:
29 Gennaio 2006 ore 21:40

Egregio Mr Bush, lei dovrebbe innanzitutto chiedere scusa alle centinaia di vittime irachene e ai suoi stessi connazionali, per aver autorizzato un’operazione quale quella di buttarsi giù le torri gemelle da solo, insieme al suo amico Blair, Binladen, Berlusconi e quanti attingono dai suoi personali pozzi di petrolio.
Poi avere i coglioni di presentarsi ad un tribunale internazionale per essere giudicato per crimini contro l’umanità, strage e genocidio, poi………. essere tutti giustiziati come a NORIMBERGA con esecuzione immediata

98

giovanni scrive:
29 Gennaio 2006 ore 17:58

trovo l’iniziativa degli alberi di natale per ogni caduto americano molto originale e d’effetto. fa riflettere, però… almeno noi non facciamo differenza fra caduti americani , in paese straniero, e caduti iracheni morti nel loro paese. non dimentichiamo che le prime vere vittime innocenti sono questi ultimi.
ciao giovanni

97

SPLEEN scrive:
30 Dicembre 2005 ore 00:10

sei un fottuto genio. stima.

96

DeadPixel scrive:
29 Dicembre 2005 ore 16:22

Lee,

well, can you read?? or maybe the problem is that you can’t argue some facts??

Anyway, don’t bother, it will probably be a waste of time, we’ll talk again when u.s. invades Iran.

as for now, so long.

95

er mahico scrive:
29 Dicembre 2005 ore 16:20

a good brain gives short answers.

like me:

Eric …….. try to get a laid sometime. possibly with girls.

:cccp:Only the Comunism can save us:cccp:

94

Eric Lee scrive:
29 Dicembre 2005 ore 15:09

Dead Pixel, please look up the meaning of the word ‘hyperbole’…two exchanges does not make “quite some time”. As for “also if Saddam was so bad, he was also 15 years ago so why the u.s. army didn’t take him out in the first war when they were at the gates of badgad and already crushed any defence?? “…there are plenty of us over here asking the same question.

Bush Sr FUCKED UP…and left the Iraqi people holding the bag. Bush Jr hasn’t been God’s gift to the world either…but on the other hand, when I see people lining up for mioles to vote, knowing that they face snipers and truck bombs, I really don’t need to have seen them screaming “We want the vote!” the week before to know they want it.

They’re risking death to get it and all they have to do to avoid that risk is stay home. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist…just open eyes and an open mind.

The rest of your post was pretty nuch incomprehensible due to the lack of caps, punctuation, grammar and an occasional pause for breath…it’s awfully hard to read a solid block of letters that doesn’t carry an occasional space in it. You keep finding yourself reading the same line over and over.

This could maybe be the problem with your through processes… your brain keeps spouting the same lines over and over.

Maybe…just MAYBE…it’s you who’s been brainwashed.

Oh…and er mahico.

A willingness to die for a ideal does not mean it’s “your greatest dream”.

Grow a brain…before your head caves in! People who think in extremes act in extremes, and that makes it pretty much impossible to ever find a middle ground.

(Fucking fanatics…don’t think…just spout empty rhetoric and shout down opposing views with slogans.)

93

er mahico scrive:
29 Dicembre 2005 ore 14:22

for me is funny read the delirius of a neocon… (but also is sad read of a genocide versus muslim community):sad:
i don’t want be in silenze in front of this sack:sad:

92

DeadPixel scrive:
29 Dicembre 2005 ore 07:40

hey mister Lee and Mahico, i’ve been following your little ‘war of words’, it’s been going on a while now. it looks to me that you guys will never agree on anything so why you don’t just go on with your lives? to mister Lee, the only thing i can think off is your government washed your brain and i think it’s too late to get any logical thought out of you, you’re hopeless. just know that you cannot bring “democracy” or “freedom” to a country by declaring war to them, can you?? also if Saddam was so bad, he was also 15 years ago so why the u.s. army didn’t take him out in the first war when they were at the gates of badgad and already crushed any defence?? or was it a political move to keep the terror and press Koweit to let u.s. have a military base in the region??? i don’t know but think about that, if u.s. really cared about iraki, why they didn’t finish the job then?? later on came the 15 years embargo that cost the lives of 500,000 kids but did anyone do anything about it?? no!! Saddam was also a dictator earlier when the iran-irak war was going on, when u.s. gave him so generously the biological/chemical weapons he could use against iran, so at that time he was not so bad cauz he was working for the states?? u.s. closed their eyes when he used the same weapons against the kurds, need i say more?? i could use the same argument about the Talibans, you do know that?? countless times in the past the states were shaping the world to their liking, in the Middle-East or African and of course South America, they’re just continuing on the same path they always did but the new thing is that they now lie to get an excuse to go to war.
but let’s see the results now, before Saddam was dictator and killed hi enemies but still majority of iraki lived, maybe not such a great lives but still living, now most of them are or dead or starving, what i say is no matter how bad Saddam was, the situation of the civilians population is worse now…
also the country who at least was one country in the past is on the breach of being parted in three parts, one for the kurds, then one ’shiite’ and one ’suuni’, how good is that knowing that they will fight against each other for the oil?? at least before most of them were ‘united’ against Saddam since he is from the minority.
about their “freedom” and “voting rights” , great words that u.s. like to use a lot, the past election most of the iraki voted for the candidate that their spiritual leader told them to vote for, so that didn’t help a lot, did it??
lately the u.s. army finally gave control of some parts of north bagdad to some iraki leaders, who are the same persons/groups that they went to eliminate in the first place, ironic,no?? oh, and the english did the same in the south…
finally, that illegitimate war didn’t fix anything, killed many iraki civilians ans many u.s. troops, and since the majority shiite i close to Iran government, the country might end up controlled by the shiite and Iran… but maybe.. just maybe.. that was the plan in the first place??????

91

er mahico scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 19:30

ERic_ask_
Why not? Same reason as the the snipers and the truck-bombers? Because maybe you’re afraid that the majority of Iraqis don’t WANT to live the lives YOU choose for them?

Me? i dont’ believe i’m so important.

maybe opec….and the great democratizer machine of USA!!!
i don’t remember iraqi people go on place to shown and yell “WE want vote ,we want vote!!!”
maybe your Rambo see too.

please continue this war so we can use your political strategy like the worst,weak,coward,insensible,maniac,sadic,illegal choice of a “democratic” state.

(for my greeting of death for a US muppet:
it isn’t the dream of every muppet die for his flag? )

90

Eric Lee scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 19:21

You wish a lot of people a lot of bad things, er mahico. You wish death on a soldier (like that will ‘teach’ him something’) you wish a comunist takeover on my nation (as if the Soviet Union hadn’t just gotten through proving for themselves that communism DOESN’T WORK).

And this whole “just to steal our oil” weping crap is getting pretty damn old. If you live in the Middle East, OPEC sets the price we pay for your oil…and will continue to do so. (And incidentally, we happen to be your best customer.) If it weren’t for the fact that your leaders make themselves obscenely wealthy off of American oil dollars while keeping you single-mindedly fixated on this “Great Satan” delusion of yours, you’d all enjoy an amazingly high standard of living off of those dollars…but that’s your own fault.

When you let those in power in your nation delude you with the same ‘common enemy’ bullshit that Hitler used to gain power, you’re just as responnsible as the German people…and just as stupid.

I’m going to point out once more that overwhelming numbers of Iraqis stood in lines miles long, risking bombs and bullets, to exercise a long awaited right to cast a vote.

IRAQI bombs and bullets…while American soldiers stood risking those same Iraqi bombs and bullets to protect those Iraqis who so badly wanted that right to vote.

Tell me…don’t YOU want them to have that right?

Why not? Same reason as the the snipers and the truck-bombers? Because maybe you’re afraid that the majority of Iraqis don’t WANT to live the lives YOU choose for them?

I gotta clue you in, Mr “I won’t even use my name here because I’m so brave and tough!”

The USA is not your worst enemy.

YOU are…and you don’t even know it.

89

er mahico scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 18:17

i’ve got 2 baygon for buzz and fly in my house…
is a WMD like factory your heroic amry bombed?
can i kill the insect with it? or Bush will bomb my house?

i hope USA will become comunist :cccp:and bring away the poor soldiers back home soon.

don’t worry about saddam…the dollars from CIA will serve to him for a good holiday….

Eric lee you are my Hero please write again!!:star:
Kurdistan people love the people like you that defend (when gas danger is past) by saddam, and bombing them for stole them Oil… they love you i’m sure!!!!:celebrate:

88

Eric Lee scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 17:52

I keep hearing this “No WMD” crap. Where do you get it. From the assinine idea STILL going around that WMD means ‘nuclear weapon’? Hussein liked nerve gasses…he manufactured them, he stockpiled them, He used them on kuwaitis, he used them on Americans, he used them on Iraqi nationals of Kurdish descent, and when retreating from those stockpiles he chemically contaminated them in such a way as to make POSITIVELY identifying them time-consuming enough to shove it to the back pages.

Doesn’t mean they weren’t there and weren’t found, and never HAS meant that. Put ‘Hussein’ and ‘aerosol neurotoxin’ in your google window and do your own damn research…or bury your head in the sand, but either way, shut up until you know what you’re talking about.

No WMDs my hairy ass!

87

er mahico scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 15:36

Arms…Chopped by Taliban….
all right.
taliban are at the power since 25years ago….. before 2001 the chopped arms are too few?

i hope you will die soldier,
so u can understand the truth. cause your flag is empty now. all stars fall down and turned in $$$ for the fat people who lies to you for convincing going in a big big trouble…
SEE in the Eyes your Leader .rebel to this massacre!
how many man are died for a pipeline?
i think too much.

86

swampthing scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 15:28

questa guerra è immorale perchè basata su delle menzogne.

85

aa scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 15:16

appunto. La mafia non viene combattuta perchè immorale, ma perchè esiste ed è dannosa. Voi condannate la guerra perchè, per voi, immorale. Nella storia, tutti quelli che la pensavano così sono finiti nell’oblio, aa.

84

swampthing scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 14:48

cos’è? uno slogan della Fiat?

Attenzione che si può applicare la stessa affermazione a quasi tutto.
Esempi:
il terrorismo c’è punto.
La mafia c’è punto.
La corruzione c’è punto.
E via dicendo punto.

83

aa scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 14:35

quanto moralismo. La guerra c’è punto. aa

82

American Soldier scrive:
28 Dicembre 2005 ore 13:30

As an american soldier currently overseas, should I die in combat, you do not have permission to associate my name with your political agenda. Thanks

-The American Soldier

BTW, is war more wrong than a child having his arm chopped off for trying to protect his parents from the Taliban?

81

tara scrive:
27 Dicembre 2005 ore 21:00

MasterCon

* How much does it cost to disarm a country?

* Military personnel: $30 billion

* Combat weapons: $72 billion

* Rebuilding the country: $8 billion

* The look on your victims’ faces when they learn there were no WMDs after all: Priceless

* There are some justifications for war that money can’t buy. For everything else, there’s MasterCon.

Pagine: « 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 »

Scrivi un commento

Nome

E-mail (non verrà pubblicata)

Sito Web

Avvisami via e-mail della presenza di nuovi commenti.

Attenzione: i commenti passano per Askimet, un filtro antispam. Se il commento non appare, probabilmente è stato bloccato. Non rispeditelo più volte. Controllo regolarmente la coda dei commenti e lo sblocco io. Se ricevete un avviso che il commento deve essere approvato, vuol dire che avete scritto parolacce o che state scrivendo del signoraggio. Anche in questo caso aspettate che il commento venga approvato. Una veloce lettura al regolamento del blog e alle domande frequenti è auspicabile prima di commentare.